Reference Bioelectrical Impedance Values for Children of Normal Body Mass Index in Southeastern Brazil

Main Article Content

Cristina Malzoni Ferreira Mangia
Alexandre Carneluti
Maria Cristina Andrade


Background: Bioelectrical analysis measures two bioelectrical vectors: Resistance (R) and reactance (Xc). Resistance is the pure opposition of a biological conductor to the flow of an alternating current through the intra and extra-cellular ionic solution and it is inversely related to the dynamics of body fluids and body composition.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the reference values of the indexes bioelectrical impedance (BI) for children of normal body mass index in southeastern Brazil of middle-income country.

Methods: Two hundred eighty-one children with normal body mass index were included in the study (135 female and 146 male), aged 4 to 129 months, selected from federal public urban school in São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, where bioelectrical impedance values resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) values were measured in order to establish reference values of these parameters.

Results: The anthropometric variables, body mass index, z-scores and bioelectrical impedance parameters were evaluated. For both genders, the mean and standard deviation of anthropometric variables were: age (months): 73.42 ± 34.65; weight (kg): 23.5 ± 9.46; height (m): 1.16±0.22; BMI (kg/m2): 16.65±1,75; Xc (ohms): 63.92±9.6; R (ohms): 749±75.26. For analysis, the children were stratified into three groups for each gender, being divided by ages: 4 to 23 months; 24 to 71 months and 72 to 129 months. Linear regression analysis showed R had a significant progressive decrease with age (p=0.0003) while Xc had a progressive increase (p=0.0065) with age increase. We analyzed by multiple regression the associations between R and Xc with anthropometric variables by age group to establish the reference values, confidence intervals and the tolerance limits for a new individual observation.

Conclusion: The BI reference values were established, in a field where there is a relative lack of publications, and we collected relevant information about resistance and reactance in a population of middle income setting that could be used in epidemiologic studies and could be used reference value in children with altered body composition.

Bioelectrical resistance, bioelectrical reactance, bioelectrical impedance analysis, children, fluids and electrolyte, dynamic, capacitive properties, BMI

Article Details

How to Cite
Mangia, C. M. F., Carneluti, A., & Andrade, M. C. (2020). Reference Bioelectrical Impedance Values for Children of Normal Body Mass Index in Southeastern Brazil. Asian Journal of Pediatric Research, 4(3), 7-17.
Original Research Article


Davies PSW. Body composition assess-ment. Arch Dis Child. 1993;69:337-338.

Hammond J, Rona RJ, Chinn S. Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994;48: 164-171.

Lukaski HC, Bolonchuck WW, Hall CB, Siders WA. Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol. 1986;60:1327-1332.

Lukaski HC. Biological indexes considered in the derivation of the bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J. Clin Nutr. 1996;64(Suppl):397-404.

Mattar JA and the Brazilian Group for Bioimpedance Study. Application of total body bioimpedance to the critically ill patients. New Horiz. 1996;4:493-502.

Barbosa-Silva MCG, Barros AJD, Wang J, Heymsfield SB, Pierson Jr RN. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: Population reference values for phase angle by age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:49-52.

Walker SP, Granthan–McGregor S, Powell C, Fletcher P, Himes JH. Bioelectric impedance, anthropometry and body composition in stunted and non-stunted children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990;44:763-768.

Fagundes U, Oliva CAG, Fagundes-Neto U. Evaluation of the nutritional status of Indian children from Alto Xingu. Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78(5):383-8.

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Medición del Cambio del Estado Nutricional. Directrices para Evaluar el Efecto Nutricional de Programas de Alimentácion Suplementaria Destinados a Grupos Vulnerables. OMS, Ginebra. 1983;1-105.

Waterloo JC, Buzina R, Keller W, Lane JM, Nichaman MZ, Tanner JM. The presentation and use of height and weight data for comparing the nutritional status of group of children under age of 10 years. Bull World Health Organization. 1977;55: 489-498.

De Palo T, Messina G, Edefoni A, Perfumo F, Pisanello L, Peruzzi L, Di Iorio B, Mignozzi M, Vienna A, Conti G, Penza R, Piccoli A. Normal values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in children and puberty. Nutrition. 2000;16:417-424.

Piccoli A, Fanos V, Peruzzi L, Schena S, et al. Reference values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in neonates in the first week after birth. Nutrition. 2002;18:383-387.

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth charts. Sept 9; 2010.

[Last cited Aug 24, 2020]


Lukaski HC. Requirements for clinical use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Ann New York Acad Sci. 1999;873:72-76.

Baumgartner RN, Chumlea WMC, Roche AF. Associations between bioelectric impedance and anthropometric variables. Hum Biol. 1987;59:235-244.

Siervogel RM, Woynarowska B, Chumlea C, Guo S, Roche AF. Bioelectrical impedance measures of body composition: Their relationship with level of blood pressure in young adults. Human Biol. 1987;59:245-255.

US Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy os Sciences-National Research Council. Committee on Nutrition Advisory to CDC. Comparision of body weights and lenghts or heights of group of children. Nutrion Rev. 1974;32(9):284-8.

SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6. 4th Ed. Vol 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 1989;846.

Nagano M, Suita S, Yamanouchi T. The validity of bioelectrical impedance phase angle for nutritional assessment in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:1035-39.

Fuller NJ, Ellia M. Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the “whole body” and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: Comparison with densitometry and anthropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989;43: 779-791.

Deuremberg P, Wetstarte JA, Hautvast JGAJ, van der Kooy K. Is the bioelectrical impedance method valid? Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:179-180.

Organ LW, Bradhan GB, Gore DT, Lozier SL. Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: Theory and application of a new technique. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77:88-112.

Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Visser M, et al. Techniques used in the measurement of body composition: An overview with emphasis on bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(Suppl): 478S-84S.

Gregory JW, Greene SA, Scrimgeour CM, Rennie MJ. Body water measurement in growth disorders: A comparison of bioelectrical impedance and skinfold thickness techniques with isotope dilution. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:220-222.

Baumgartener RN, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Bioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:16-23.

De Lorenzo A, Andreoli A, Matthie J, Withers P. Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theorical methods: A tecnological review. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82:1542-1558.