Proficiency, Attitudes, and Practices in Breastfeeding of Participants in a Pediatric Congress
Asian Journal of Pediatric Research,
Objective: To investigate the proficiency, practices, and attitudes about breastfeeding of participants in a Pediatrics Congress.
Methods: Cross-sectional study in which an online questionnaire was applied, using a specific QRcode, for each study participant, in June 2018. The questions were formulated according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Among the 39 questions, 13 identified the profile of the participants, 19 questions assessed the proficiency in breastfeeding and 7 questions the practices and attitudes.
Results: Responses to 296 questionnaires were evaluated, 62.5% of which were health professionals and 37.5% were undergraduate health students. In assessing proficiency, the global average did not reach the expected minimum of 70%. But the highest proficiency averages were found among health professionals (p: 0.0136), among professionals with more recent degrees (p <0.0001), and those who performed most of their activity in the public sector (p: 0.018). 77% of health professionals and 73% of students assessed attitudes and practices about breastfeeding as appropriate.
Conclusion: The low proficiency in the population studied points to the need for periodic training of professionals in breastfeeding and greater emphasis on undergraduate curricula in the health area on the subject.
- human milk
- clinical practice guide
How to Cite
World Health Organization (WHO). Global nutrition targets 2025: policy brief series. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2014.
Cockerham-Colas L, Geer L, Benker K, et al. Exploring and influencing the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals towards extended breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7: 143-150.
Sigman-Grant M, Kim Y. Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes of Nevada health care professionals remain virtually unchanged over 10 years. J Hum Lac. 2015;1-5.
Esselmont E, Moreau K, Aglipay M, et al. Residents breastfeeding knowledge, comfort, practices, and perceptions: results of the Breastfeeding Resident Education Study (BRESt). BMP Pediatr. 2018;18:170-177.
Pound CM, Williams K, Grenon R, et al. Breastfeeding knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and attitudes of Canadian physicians. J Hum Lact 2014;30:298-309.
Artantas AB, Tetik BK, Kılıc M, et al. Knowledge level, attitude and own experience of health professionals about breastfeeding and breast milk in a city of Turkey: a cross-sectional study. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016;114:514-520.
Feldman-Winter L, Szucs K, Milano A, et al. National trends in pediatricians´ practices and attitudes about breastfeeding: 1995 to 2014. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171229.
Gonzalez AP, Palmer J, Downes K, Young C. Attitudes and knowledge about breastfeeding among obstetrics and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:17-18.
Melin A, Björklund P, Zwedberg S. Pediatrician´s experiences of working with breastfeeding: an interview study. Sex Reprod Health 2018;16:218-223.
Taveras EM, Li R, Grummer-Strawn L, et al. Mothers’ and clinicians’ perspectives on breastfeeding counseling during routine preventive visits. Pediatrics 2004;113:405-411.
Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Rose EA. Pixels vs. paper: comparing online and traditional survey methods in sport psychology. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28:100-108.
Hibberts M, Johnson RB, Hudson K. Common survey sampling techniques. In: Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences, Gedeon L, ed., Springer, New York, 2012.
Barua A. Methods for decision-making in survey questionnaires based on the Likert scale. J Asian Sci Res. 2013;3:35-38.
Equator Network. Checklist STROBE cross-sectional. Available:https://www.equatornetwork.org/ Accessed 14 Jan. 2020.
Ryan TP. Sample size determination and power. New York; 2013.
Hair Jr. JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis; 2009.
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, Vienna, 2019.
Wilcoxon F. Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1947;3:119-122.
Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:583-621.
Nemenyi PB. Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons [Ph.D. Thesis]. Princeton University, Princeton; 1963.
World Health Organization (WHO). Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: Background and Implementation. UNICEF and WHO; 2009.
Abolyan LV. The breastfeeding support and promotion in Baby-Friendly Maternity Hospitals and Not-as-Yet Baby-Friendly Hospitals in Russia. Breastfeed Med. 2006;1:71–78.
Forster DA, McLachlan HL. Breastfeeding initiation and birth setting practices: a review of the literature. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2007;52:273–280.
Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475-490.
Wood SF, Podrasky J, McMonagle MA, et al. Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia. Plos One. 2017;12(20).
Leavitt G, Martínez S, Ortiz N, et al. Knowledge about breastfeeding among a group of primary care physicians and residents in Puerto Rico. J Community Health. 2009;34:1-5.
Moukarzel S, Mamas C, Warstadt MF, et al. A case study on breastfeeding education in Lebanon‟s public medical school: exploring the potential role of social networks in medical education. Med Educ Online. 2018;23:1527629.
Gary AJ, Birmingham EE, Jones LB. Improving breastfeeding medicine in undergraduate medical education: a student survey and extensive curriculum review with suggestions for improvement. Educ Health. 2017;30:163-168.
Abstract View: 43 times
PDF Download: 26 times